Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Free markets, deregulation, small government, low taxes, control spending, and no pork

If I understand the tenants of the Republican party, these are their values. They are also John McCain's reform prescriptions for change. The problem is that these are the same prescriptions that they have been giving us for over thirty years since Ronald Reagan was president. The problem also is that they don't seem be be working very well in practice. Exhibit number one is the current crisis in the financial markets. Failure to provide a reasonable level of government regulation for security firms and non-bank mortgage lenders has led the way into our current financial mess. The same can be said about the problems with the government sponsored entities: FNMA and Freddie Mac. The irony is that the same proponents for these policies and their Wall Street benefactors are the very same ones who now seek government assistance to bail out failed institutions. What ever happened to the notion of "free markets?" The proposed solutions to prop up these companies or to facilitate a fire sale through government guarantees are anything but "free" to the taxpayers. So much for deregulation and unfettered markets.

Well, one could say that we are just in one of those economic downturns perhaps even a recession, but according to McCain, the fundamentals of the economy are good. Is he looking at the rising unemployment rates, the falling value of the US dollar, our exploding trade deficit, the mushrooming budget deficit, our national debt, or the cost of health care? What about wages, cost of education, and the sharp decline in home valuations. And now with the recent events on Wall Street,yesterday's market decline was biggest one day retreat on the DOW since 9/11! What about the declining value of retirement funds?

John McCain is right about one thing: America desperately needs reform. Unfortunately, he and his running mate are very unlikely to be able to deliver. By his own admission, he doesn't view himself as steeped in understanding the economy. His running mate has even less experience with the macro economy. Even more sadly he relies on a team of advisers that includes lobbyists for special interests. Chief among them is the lobbyist for USB, former Senator Phil Gramm, who characterizes Americans as "whiners" while his fingerprints are all over much of the financial deregulation that has got us where we are today. Just imagine Phil Gramm as the likely Secretary of the Treasury under McCain. I don't want my investments dependent on their prescriptions. They will simply mimic the current administration's approach over the last eight years that has run us into a ditch.

America needs to reform its financial system and put regulatory safeguards in place to prevent market excesses created by totally unfettered markets. Free markets yes, but with appropriate regulation. We need to get America on a sound financial footing by critically evaluating all government spending including defense to eliminate unnecessary spending. No longer can we afford deficit spending which is simply a tax on future generations if it is to be repaid responsibly. Otherwise, the Treasury will simply print a few more dollars while the value of our currency declines against other major currencies like the Euro and the Yen. Without reform and fiscal responsibility, we are destined to become the financial equivalent of a "Banana Republic" with inflation to boot. Already we see a massive transfer of our wealth abroad while the US Treasury sells bonds to sovereign funds and international investors. As our economic woes continue, these investors will loose confidence in our ability to repay, and the interest rates will correspondingly go up to attract the capital. This will only compound the problem with a larger share of our discretionary budget going to debt service.

The choice in this election is quite clear. We need change. Although John McCain has cleverly cast himself as a Maverick, the fact remains that his staff and supporters are the same ones that have pushed the these same Republican principles for most of the last thirty years. Continued tax cuts for the wealthy, mismanaged government that caters to special interests, and failure to invest in critical infrastructure at home will only make the problem worse. The elimination of a few pork programs will simply not be enough. I fully agree that the earmark process should be shut down, but this is simply a drop in the proverbial bucket when looking at the whole scheme of things.

The Democrats and Barak Obama may not have all the answers, but one thing is for sure: They do legitimately represent change from what we have been doing and they have the only successful track record of sound fiscal policy from the Clinton Administration. If we expect to get different results in the future, then we must do something different now from what we have done for the last eight, or for most of the last thirty years. Putting America First is not about supporting either of the parties, but America can not take a risk on the possibility of change. We can do this America, but we must change NOW!

1 comment:

Unknown said...

History tends to repeat itself. In the 1980's we witnessed the Savings and Loan crisis which resulted in the failure of 747 Savings and Loans due to deregulation and imprudent real estate lending that cost the American taxpayer 160.1 billion dollars.
Among the scandals of that period were two familar names: McCain and Bush.
The Lincoln Savings failure led to the Keating Five political scandal, in which five U.S. senators were implicated in an influence-peddling scheme. It was named for Charles Keating, who headed Lincoln Savings and made $300,000 as political contributions to them in the 1980s. Three of those senators - Alan Cranston(D-CA), Don Riegle(D-MI), and Dennis DeConcini(D-AZ) - found their political careers cut short as a result. Two others - John Glenn(D-OH) and John McCain(R-AZ) - were rebuked by the Senate Ethics Committee for exercising "poor judgment" for intervening with the federal regulators on behalf of Keating.
Silverado Savings and Loan collapsed in 1988, costing taxpayers $1.3 billion. Neil Bush, son of then Vice President of the United States George H. W. Bush, was Director of Silverado at the time. Neil Bush was accused of giving himself a loan from Silverado, but he denied all wrongdoing. The US Office of Thrift Supervision investigated Silverado's failure and determined that Neil Bush had engaged in numerous "breaches of his fiduciary duties involving multiple conflicts of interest."
As a director of a failing thrift, Bush voted to approve $100 million in what were ultimately bad loans to two of his business partners. And in voting for the loans, he failed to inform fellow board members at Silverado Savings & Loan that the loan applicants were his business partners.Neil Bush paid a $50,000 fine and was banned from banking activities for his role in taking down Silverado. A Resolution Trust Corporation Suit against Bush and other officers of Silverado was settled in 1991 for $26.5 million.